• FEATURED WRITERS:
  • DIVAKAR KAMBLI
  • AMOL REDIJ
  • P. K. DASTOOR
  • ANIKET SAWANT
  • DEVIKARANI KAMATH
  • ARUN DABHOLKAR

FEATURED ARTICLES

Just a few days before the Oscars, I watched “The Artist” Read More ...

One man I have believed who can facilely camouflage pathos Read More ...

He’s an octogenarian! You won’t believe. Read More ...

Lately, Robot has been in news for shrieking Ra. One. Read More ...

What a black humour! To call stylish walker, a langda. Pawan Malhotra as Salim... Read More ...

As not vitiated by a speck of ‘herdship mentality' that Mumbaikars borne... Read More ...

I do not understand whether to cry or enjoy since the day Sachin Tendulkar. Read More ...

Showing posts with label Indian Celebrities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indian Celebrities. Show all posts

I have loved Marathi culture and the Marathi art – literature, theatre, cinema, et al. However, lately I have ended up frustrated watching Bharat Jadhav, Makarand Anaspure movies. PuLa’s humour of yesteryears still makes me laugh but no art form of recent times has brought a smile to me. A judge on Fu Bai Fu becomes a participant in an equally pathetic show on Sony TV. A Marathi film title sounds like a latest Salman’s hit movie. The titles of Marathi dramas have no head or tail – “Chehra Feri” etc.
Where has that glory gone? Where has that creativity vanished that once ruled the art domain?
While oscillating between such discouraging thoughts and browsing through likewise irritating TV channels, I took a halt at Nikhil Wagle’s interview show – “Great Bhet” on IBN Lokmat. Wagle was interviewing Abhinay Deo.
I had heard about Abhinay for his Delhi Belly and Game, both movies released this year. I never got to read or watch anything in-depth about Abhinay though. Wagle’s program did the needful but not totally satisfying.
A sigh of relief. I could see a possible revival of Marathi art in Abhinay Deo, who had done ad films for over decade, award winning ones. Other such Marathi adman I can think of is Bharat Dabholkar, both fall in different leagues though.
In the interview with Wagle, Abhinay candidly mentioned that one thing which he will never do is “mediocrity”, which also can perhaps be interpreted that he will not do anything that the current Marathi creative lot is doing and boasting about – he was point blank in his remark. Deo also stated that when he wanted to join films, he did not want to be a part of the then pathetic state of cinema with movies like Jadugar, Toofan were bombing at the box-office. He made a right move and turned towards to ads to harness his creative and storytelling skills.
And he made an entry when the time was right, when the audience had matured.
Abhinay gave us movies like Delhi Belly and Game. Though Game released on April 2011, Delhi Belly is Deo’s debut feature film, which Aamir had offered to him 4 years ago. Delhi Belly was slated as a dirty, shitty, unnecessary humour, however, Deo clarifies that “Even the gaali-galoch has its own reasoning in the film. There’s a certain way in which the youth of today talks and we can’t refute it.”  The filmmaking is perfect, which possibly only an ad-maker can envision. Personally, I enjoyed the movie, I loved it. I was curious to learn more about Abhinay Deo ever since I watched Delhi Belly, a movie that requires courage to be made in India.
I watched the entire interview. Wagle, as usual, was engaged in unnecessary questions, much alike what an average Marathi mind thinks and operates today. Wagle did not mention about his other movie, Game, a stylish action thriller, which is a Hollywood treat, a fast paced movie, likable despite having Abhishek Bachchan in it. I enjoyed Deo’s this movie as well.
However, Wagle’s myopic view about person’s ability could not see beyond asking personal questions to Abhinay.
Abhinay’s allusion about mediocrity was towards the end of the interview; else it could have given Wagle few cues about what exactly to ask Deo, a person of such a high creative stature.
- P. K. Dastoor

In cricket, it is said that the hook shot, though most marvelous, is the most dangerous to play. Slight misjudgment and the delivery can hit you like an uppercut, enough to bruise you for rest of your life.

Quite similarly, Ms. Arundhati Roy, our very own, who gave India its first Booker, has been smartly facing the deliveries and surviving at the benevolence of many benefit of doubts.

However, this time, she seems to have missed it. She tried a hook at the Kashmir issue, which unfortunately didn’t go well off the boundary. The timing was wrong perchance. Or maybe the tact; one shouldn’t be playing every delivery between mid-wicket and backward square-leg on the leg side. Some other shot could have possibly made Ms. Roy win praise akin Tendulkar – “pride of the nation”. However, that did not happen so and instead Arundhati had to derogate herself with a taint of “traitor of the nation”.

While her Booker might make us feel proud about the zeal, Ms. Roy’s subsequent acts have only made us feel sour about her ubiquitous performances. For no rhyme or reason, she has been pouncing on every opportunity that she thought could get her publicity and media attention, possible smitten by the honour and reputation that her cousin enjoys.

Arundhati Roy has many times critiqued on the right things. However, more than that, she opined about something that made her image and intellect spiral down. Whether she does it for publicity or to flaunt her astuteness, is something only she can answer or the media can speculate. However, parachuting between issues, like Narmada Andolan, Maoism, Kashmir, and similar, does give a sense of chasing media attention. Given that she has the caliber of winning a Booker, it doesn’t require any super intelligence about how to diplomatically tackle sensitive issues like that of Kashmir and Naxals-Maoists; she can be superbly imaginative about how to conjure up things.

The Guardian, New York Times, TIME, may all praise for the analytical views she has given on Afghanistan, Israel, Sri Lanka, Nuclear Policy but her words in India are certainly taken in a bitter tone, which if continues, can turn out to be a debacle for the pride & prestige that she once enjoyed in India.

It is unarguable that a writer like Arundhati will have myopic and distant imaginative about everything that is happening around and that she is born in a democratic-republic gives her right to expression. However, why do so through petty things that invoke more of blasphemy than eulogy. Ms. Roy has been and is a good writer – a story teller, which one of the most respected literary awards (Man Booker) also has testified. It is then surprising that her quest stalls at winning just one. Her research work too seems to be good, given the fact that she dig up issues that appeal to the masses. However, why not make use of those same research skills to come up with an unthinkable narrative that can fetch her a “Pulitzer”, may be. Or simply be like Hilary Mantel of Wolf Hall (2009 Booker Prize Winner), whose ultimate piquancy is to write, write, and write; keeping all other transient issues at bay.

It would rather be appreciated that Ms. Arundhati Roy gets evolved from and not involved in these issues of national unrest. Taking cues from these issues, glorifying them, building up characters, brewing up a fictional tale, and marching your way to the next the “Booker” or a “Nobel for Literature”, possibly looks more sensible at this time.

Your fans and book lovers surely don’t want to look at you as a “single book surprise”.
- Amol Redij