• FEATURED WRITERS:
  • DIVAKAR KAMBLI
  • AMOL REDIJ
  • P. K. DASTOOR
  • ANIKET SAWANT
  • DEVIKARANI KAMATH
  • ARUN DABHOLKAR

FEATURED ARTICLES

Just a few days before the Oscars, I watched “The Artist” Read More ...

One man I have believed who can facilely camouflage pathos Read More ...

He’s an octogenarian! You won’t believe. Read More ...

Lately, Robot has been in news for shrieking Ra. One. Read More ...

What a black humour! To call stylish walker, a langda. Pawan Malhotra as Salim... Read More ...

As not vitiated by a speck of ‘herdship mentality' that Mumbaikars borne... Read More ...

I do not understand whether to cry or enjoy since the day Sachin Tendulkar. Read More ...

Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts

Our books, which are our principal vehicles of expression, can reach people through impersonal mechanisms. This is what makes the world of books so uniquely democratic and accessible.
From the blog amitavghosh.com/blog/ dt. 6th Feb, 2012
*********
I’ll have no hiccups to rank ‘Mukhavata’ in the line of Dostoevsky and Marquez works, minus the sexual overtures. Arun Sadhu is a self-effacing author who believes in the power of fiction to ameliorate society and perhaps the only writer who shuns self-promoting in the realm where internationally recognized authors have surrendered.
Forget the promoting, interviews and reviews.
They accompany you like sycophants. Remember, reading is like wandering through a territory of solitude.
From the blog: DayWalker’s Dreambeats dt. 13th Oct, 2011
*********
These are two views expressed on two different blogs, both devoted to literature leading to the similar conclusion.
Amitav Ghosh (Author: River of Smoke) has expressed in this blog that was repeated in Hindustan Times of Feb7th saying: I suspect that most of us were drawn to the world of books precisely because it provided an island of quiet within the din of *tamashastan*.
In fact, the writer and the writing are omnipresent. But the bad fruits of Information Technology have poisoned the writer to fall unconscious. It’s a case similar to district editions of daily morningers where one gets information restricted to the particular district only.
All literature festivals are mostly successful only because of the attraction the readers feel about the writers and more than that the pleasure of handling the books they never could see in the local book stalls.
Akhil Bharatiya Marathi Sahitya Sammelan is a big annual event in Marathi literary world. This year it was in Chandrapur, coal mine city where the red and black clouds rule the environment along with Naxalite influence.
Everyone, but the hosts, was sceptical about the success of the event this year in Chandrapur. Many of the Marathi book publishers in Mumbai under this impression did mini events of publishing their books neglecting to participate establishing temporary stalls as the practice is.
Astonishingly the Chandrapurians and their neighbouring villages and townships proved everyone wrong. More than a lakh of appreciators of literature visited the conclave buying books worth more than thirty million. Hitherto a record figure. There were no great celebrities in large number. The President Vasant Abaji Dahake, though one of the most brilliant poets and novelists, is not a so called popular figure. However, his thoughts and analysis of why certain literary achievements in Marathi are not yet made on the large-scale universal level were eye opening and quite easy to understand even for the audience which doesn’t take the literature seriously.
The lesson that can be drawn from such an event is simple. People are hungry to read. They want more books on various subjects to see, handle and read. The local bookstall however big or sophisticated it may be doesn’t satisfy their choice. They want to choose the books and where else is a bigger opportunity than such events or medium and large scale exhibitions.
Where is the author in this? May be may not be. It does not make a great difference though his presence is expected and enjoyable.
However, when the author appears as a performer and if he has proved to be controversial, the things may go berserk. In this age of parochial thinking and disrespect, growing incidents happen, as in case of Salman Rushdie at the Jaipur Festival. The events of this kind are on such a rampant growth that someday it may happen to the innocent love story writers; who knows.
It’s the destiny of the writers. They don’t get this kind of glamour. “Instant” and “limelight-full”! It is temporary but the attraction is immense. One can’t resist it.
The actors are destined to this. They get immense fame at a go. The writers have to toil for it lifetime. But the fall also can be speedy. They are fastened together.
Another category is the reporters. They are on the forefront. They visit top notch politicians, dignitaries and rich people and hence know them directly making their life easier and so to say partially glamorous. They are showered with favours and gifts. The media displays them many times making them famous in comparison with the writers. Their editors are bereft of this like the directors of the actors. The writers have their own tiny islands that nobody is aware of.
This difference shall always prevail and the writers who know this shall march ahead winning over the time.
The media cannot make great writers. Maximum it can help shine them like a flash in the pan.
The Ramayan and Mahabharat, the works of writers, lasted over millenniums. Had Walmiki and Maharshi Vyas have to run after the media to promote them?
- Divakar Kambli

Gone are the days when media battled for communal harmony and democratic establishment in the societies across the border. It was popular and valued in the past because it spoke for the least spoken and voiced their concerns to the populace for smooth and democratic governance in the society. Factual journalism gradually perished over past few years due to exponential growth in the number of T.V. channels and Newspapers that eventually invited deadly competition amongst the media houses. And that is when ethical journalism breathed its last. While putting an end to true journalism, came a wave of sensational reporting, centralising its sole control in the hands of few ‘haves’ who operate the fourth estate of democracy the way they desire, to be specific, to influence the masses and earn the revenues out of obtuse coverage. It attracts the viewers in a large number, so is the revenue. To retain this figure and revenue, reporters are always on lookout for the spicy ‘junk food news’ that is easily sold following day in a massive number.

The presumed goal of the media houses today is to sustain the viewership and provide the audiences with sensational stories that help them increase their advertising revenue. Hardly any news is objectified in the media today. And that is due to the escalating influence of the corporate biggies who compel media to do as told by these few ‘haves’.
Media giants have with intent fallen prey to this trifling coverage (sensationalism). Only way to get rid of this mismanagement is to appoint the special censoring board that would strictly monitor the news being covered in the Media and act against those who don’t follow the stipulated norms.
- Kiran Patil

The master of square-cuts and cover drives is unnecessarily getting caught at silly point(s)!

I do not understand whether to cry or enjoy since the day Sachin Tendulkar (ST) declared that he would be spending 30 hundred thousand rupees on Satya Sai Baba (SSB) statue.
Sachin Tendulkar might be sitting on billions earned by his hard work and genius. However, considering the billions spent on offering completely free cardiac and neurological treatment or on cancer heart ailments that SSB’s trust offered to the aam aadmi, despite the few fragile blocks at the foundation, nowhere brings ST close to SSB.
In this opportunistic world where it has been impossible to have treatment on serious ailments, SSB can be called as a philanthropist of philanthropists. However, the stigma remains irrevocable, wherein his initial cheap hand tricks publicized as miracles thereby assuming the disciples to be idiots, one and all.
ST is a good boy with inexhaustible stamina on the ground and parallel patience in life out of the ground, until recently. But I think he is overburdened of the inertia of the goodness.
Who made him to make a statement that Mumbai belongs to everyone? He was never a politician neither did he exhibit an inclination to be one in the future. Why then should he make such senseless utterance? Or has this apparently patient looking lad come under the spell of an impatient political bigwig? A general doubt!
The examples are aplenty, fresh and stale, that the famous figures in art and sports fields have entered the political field to get mud-slinged and eat dust subsequently; nothing else. Or is there no more place left on the top and the downslide has started?
These two actions of ST have brought him to a level below. It was a matter of a few seconds. Look at the sky, regain patience and keep quiet, exhibiting a masterly “well left” at the question. Absolutely nothing more than what he does on the pitch.
A Don Bradman comparative, who could hide his expressions, cries on internationally televised channels is near to getting comparable with the gaudy heroines of Hindi movies of 70s. Let the tears flow. But to wipe them in such a situation is tantamount to acting. The rudalis and the adivasis who never inhaled the polluted weather of so-called civilized cities crying over the dead body of their near or far people seem more grief stricken though for completely different reasons.
One prima facie obvious shortfall of this public figure is he doesn’t refuse offers. May it be the exemption from customs duty or Bharat Ratna honour. It would cost him nothing much to refuse. In fact it would enhance his image. But no, his close friends think him to be a generous fellow who offers help to a few. They never quote it. They whisper as if involved in a whisper campaign.
Whisper campaigns bear no more value than the gossips, they do not understand. And such examples take away one from the image of model citizenry.
How can a man express a desire to make a statue of the so-called god who has built state-of-the-art hospitals, railway stations, and private airports, with a paltry sum of 30 hundred thousand rupees? Isn’t it ascetically ridiculous? Are there no other prestigious ways like adding this sum to SSBs foundation or helping poor patients with this poor sum?
Or are his advisors overbearing and sullied and decided to belittle him?
Recently I read unbelievable news that he wouldn’t have to pay tax on certain amount of his earnings. In fact he should show the willingness to pay the full amount and set an example of an ideal citizen. From the recent actions of him it doesn’t seem a possibility.
For certain his think tank has started leaking. The advisers are going berserk. They may be legal or accounting experts. But there is always a conscience keeper built in you. It seems to be on the back foot.
ShivSena Supremo, other day warned him on Times Now channel to play on his pitch and not on the political pitch, very aptly. When such interviews (about ShivSena) happen, the chain reaction follows faster than the nuclear process. The media always hungry like Bakasur pounces to get fed by such news.
Loksatta, a Marathi morninger is found playing second fiddle unconditionally (!) to Congress in recent times. The intentions of the erstwhile editor unwritten like British Constitution were known to any Tom, Dick and Harry. He would be the first to fire its flickering salvo against ShivSena. The short sighted writer would search for his thick glasses to reminisce and visualise the handshakes ShivSena made with other party leaders, deliberately forgetting the strange bedfellows of Congress.
The new editor of Loksatta, in his new avatar, is blaming ShivSena for the closure of Marathi schools in the area of its Central office forgetting that the main responsibility being that of ruling state coalition! What a silly statement? May be due to the jaundiced vision.
Had ShivSena been in power, the learned man would have held them doubly responsible and not the opposition then. They need a reason, no reasoning for anything to draw such illogical inferences.
Maid servants’ children are sent to English medium schools. As municipality is ruled by SS, it is their responsibility, the state policy has nothing to participate in the matter; the learned man might be thinking in the manner of Prime Minister. The PM’s perception that economic side is his liability, and the political and administrative liability is hers, might be created due to the haughty thinking, discarding tendency or simply submissiveness. The editorial brain follows the path of the non corrupt, self-effacing man at the helm. Who cares for the corruption that has brought the country on the brink when I am clean, is the silent message that has already reached the billion minds.
Also they insist the children of the leaders of the Marathi cause should attend Marathi medium schools. Why? Shouldn’t they insist for Marathi at par with English and other European languages to attain individual as well as national progress?
What exactly they think is their duty? They are the front runners in the field of improving and raising the standard of Marathi, if not to the international level at least to the national level. What’s their participation? I’ve seen many of them plagiarizing cheap phrases from Hindi movies like “All is well”, a popular phrase from a hit movie by Aamir Khan pronounced in slang, proudly.
Surprisingly psychiatrist like Rajendra Barve too uses the phrase. He may give 112 onionskin reasons for that. But what about vitiating the language? This is no promoting for certain.
The early 20th century thinkers and linguist and editors like Tilak, Agarkar and likes modified Sanskrit and English phrases and words to suit in Marathi (like say, fraction of a second in kshanardha, which is more appropriate than the original) what these Lilliputian editors are contributing? Sycophancy?
In the state where the education ministers didn’t know Marathi, the language of medium of the state, forget objecting to this dire situation, the newspapers sat like ostrich dipping its beak in the burning sand and as a hobby continued printing the interviews of dumb newcomers on the screen and the reviews of who necessarily second or third rate books written by their near ones don’t feel that this situation of language of the medium of education is their prime duty. One can’t expect more than the head-in-the-clouds thoughts from the editors.
I congratulate the new editor for repeating the act of his predecessor, as mostly the editors of Marathi newspapers are just a gloss and not mettle. The newer one too seems to be on his way of proving a flash in the pan. After all we all are traditionalists by lineage and maintain the conservatism till the last drop of our blood is dried or burned.
As he momentarily seems to have fallen in love with the word pitch let me remind that he is playing on the erstwhile pitch of Ramnath Goenka from where many others were pitched out but only Arun Shouri was called back again.
So was it written. But shall so be done?

- DevikaRani Kamath

“A stone in the hands of a rioter is no different than a refined looking black mike in the hands of a TV journalist”. (This is absolutely my quote, and so far no writer or journalist has mentioned it, I presume. As also is the title phrase.)
Both are used for pelting, forgetting law and conventions, deliberately.
Routinely, Nikhil Wagle, the chief editor of CNN IBN-Marathi wing did the same. This man is not ready to forget that the robe he is wearing is that of an editor and not of a reporter. Neither was he a good reporter, as he expressed. The eveninger he owned, lost skin when his chief reporter left him and started one of his own, many readers might remember.
I do not want to churn the past as NW’s favourite daily panelists do.
A couple of days ago, NW relayed a panel discussion on the survival and leadership of ShivSena, thereby breaking all the conventions.
Earlier the panelists used to eschew this subject as the concerned party’s internal matter. Not anymore and the anchors like NW are responsible for this gossip huckstering.
While talking about all morals, they took due care of not hurting the Sena Supremo, Balasaheb Thackeray, and kept on blaming his son executive president of ShivSena and a few next ranking leaders. It was obvious and loud that they are still scared of the roaring tiger’s wrath. Uddhav Thackeray is a cultured man. His command of language and pragmatism is beyond doubt. He, as far as possible, avoids answering using slang and filthy language of those who serialized such campaigns. He sent them packing out of Matoshree, the central office and his father’s residence when he took over as executive president, never to allow them enter ever. The trouble with Uddhav Thackeray is that he is not a mudslinging public orator and leader as one should be in the present times. Now-a-days, one needs to talk on the top of his voice, however illogical or nonsense it may be. One needs to apply Goebbels principles.
Uddhav Thackeray can’t do or doesn’t want to, is his dilemma, though media is ready with red carpet for that.
Now if he, let us assume that for time being, does so, then the same brigade on the TV channels would abuse him for not remaining as cultured as he was a few days before! But the man seems to be making strides as he wants, least worrying about the cock-a-hoop attitude of the discontented political rivals not able to reach to his position. His defectors approve Rahul Gandhi’s elevation to PM’s post; but not Uddhavs Thackeray’s to ShivSena Executive President. It is on recede now. He didn’t whirlpool his neck to the extent of damaging his vocal cords for that.
Now, NW. He did his journalistic career writing against Balasaheb Thackeray and Sharad Pawar as devoutly as any hardcore Satya Saibaba devotee. He and a few others like him could attract some limelight with success.
There is struggle for the gaining top slot among the leaders of ShivSena, and ShivSena as an opposition must survive, were points of NW’s childish discussion on the day.
In the process, the opponents abound, the then scared and now sure of not facing stiff resistance have started vociferating, to satisfy their own bosses.
Bhai Jagtap is slowly making a place for him as a spokesman of ruling party in Maharashtra who was scared away from a northern state as a campaigner. However his disarming tact to appreciate the opponent and then tiptoe into past and into irrelevant anecdotes is getting redundant; he perhaps is not able to make out yet.
One oily faced obscure journo panelist, I’m not sure but someone called him Yuvraj, was given the duty of opposing anything against ShivSena that comes across discussion table a la any Congress spokesmen or pro Congress editors in Delhi. He wasn’t ready to accept anything nor seemed to have understood the subject. He took delight in describing the session stories.
The representative sent by ShivSena was a new one but was not out immediately as expected by others there.
A question was raised over Uddhav Thackeray not allowing any meeting with ShivSainiks unlike Balasaheb Thackeray to whom the new batsman hit a six, pinpointing whether Sonia Gandhi allowed Bhai Jagtap any meeting anytime. The third partial umpire i.e. Nikhil Wagle sitting in anchor room (chair) intervened fast, before Bhai and declared him not out casting away the tantalizing question.
The next panelist was a Communist leader who didn’t budge from his opinion and could have been trouble maker was kept away as the wont of NW is.
Thank Chanakya, NW didn’t invite Sujata Anandan, the scrounging political editor of Hindustan Times whose life time vrat (vow) is to oppose ShivSena and as a whole Marathi political leaders one and all by deriving her knowledge and opinions discussing with her aunt in the kitchen, perhaps.
Next time call her, Mr. NW. it would be a wonderful mess for you.
In short, The Plaster of Paris Panelists were shedding crocodile tears.
I hope to look forward to such a discussion about congress and later on MNS from the quasi gutsy editor.
- DevikaRani Kamath

“Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures, the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge, has marked the upward surge of mankind and greed, you mark my words…” Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas) said in the 1987 movie, ‘Wall Street’

Considering only the movie part, I was utterly impressed with that dialog. I grew up enacting that dialog, it had very powerful words. I have seen the movie enough number of times to defeat the claimants of Sholay (insanely boring movie).

However, as stages of maturity and sanity passed in my life, I began to realise that the dialog was good enough only for the delivery part and could not actually be practiced. The upshot of Gekko’s words lessened over a period of time.

It was short-lived though. The words started resonating in my mind when India emerged a country of scams, frauds in 2010 – the CWG, the 2G, and the Adarsh.

There was Bofors in 1986, the fodder scam in 1996, the arms bribery scandal in 2001, and there were people like Harshad Mehta, Ketan Parikh, Telgi, all of which have shamed India repeatedly. Today we have the sucker-games in telecom, lands, food grains, onions, sports and possibly many more to come. The more is dug, the deeper it gets.

Laissez-faire capitalism proponents claim that it is inappropriate to out rightly reject greed as a negative quality. On the contrary greed should be considered as an overwhelming munificent force in human affairs and also an important underpinning for the capitalist system. However, there have been numerous arguments as this portrayal of greed misappropriates it with self-interest, which can be benevolent.

Time and again our country has been plagued with nuisances of various kinds. It was the real rats that spread the epidemic long time ago. The rats have now transformed into politicians, real estate honchos, bureaucrats, defence personnel et al. These blood sucking rats are running in pursuit of power and wealth with negligent thought about the disaster they are causing (and hence probably the word “rat race”).

It takes me by surprise thinking about the psyche of these people who ignorantly want to amass wealth about which they perhaps have no clue when and how they will utilise it. 1.7 lac crore, an amount beyond my imagination; I would perchance spend my entire life counting it (no pun intended).

What is it that so persistently drives the greed of accumulating money power or fame? Is it only the greed and is it pleasure giving in first place? Is peace of mind not important, forget about values or culture or family matter?

I wonder from where does this disproportionate goad to acquire material wealth beyond one’s need arises from. What is worse is this act of greed denies access to legitimate others who are in need of those resources and which can be utilised to build up a society that will give our country a look of a “developed country”. It is the greed of people like these that has left our country at the status of a “developing country”.

It is good to aspire about being rich & famous. It is ubiquitous and conventional in all the civilisations across the world. It would be rather harsh to synonymise this plain aspiration to greed. Greed is usually the far extreme of this aspiration, largely driven by the psyche of collecting huge amounts of money not to spend it but just to have its possession, when considered in terms of wealth. The extreme of consuming drinks for sheer delight is gluttony as is the fanatical greed for sex called lust; underlying psyche in both these examples remains greed.

Greed classically involves acquisition of material possession at the cost of other’s welfare.

Not only politicians or people who have power but I have seen many around me who despite having all the basic needs and freedom of luxury behave insanely yearning for more material wealth. People in their early sixties (who own a house, a car, have wife, pension, other savings, children supporting them, enjoyed vacations, enjoy alcohol, have had enough sex all their life, have enough well wishers around, good friends, etc) still crave for accumulating as much as they can. At that age, possibly, I would have fulfilled all my aspirations.

What is it then that there is something still missing in one’s life? What is this nature of ravenous hunger? Is it because of the society that we live in, which praises and recognises and worships only fame and richness?

Inner selfishness gives birth to greed; a paradox. Greed breeds on unawareness of the self. The greedy always craves for more than what is at hand, even when it is enough to satisfy his/her needs. It is an ineffectual attempt to satiate the barrenness within you. These self defeating and destructive mannerisms arise from unfulfilled puerile needs and the trauma of the adulthood that fails to catch pace with the mates around.

The focus then shifts from yourself and the dissension begins to avoid the self.

I am neither religious nor spiritual. However, I do end up subscribing to Gautam Buddha’s ideology of desire (which the greed is a part of) – the root cause of all human suffering.

- P. K. Dastoor

It was the Christmas time and Santa was bound to be around the corner. It was the time to go wishing for gifts from the white-bearded man. But we have to behave good for that.

Perhaps, the name at the bottom in Santa’s list might be that of Julian Assange, co-founder of the whistle-blower website Wikileaks. A man cursed upon right from the most powerful man on earth, the President of America, protested against by those fighting for privacy rights, branded as a terrorist by Sarah Palin, and still among the most admired men. He is a dark knight, the people’s choice for the Times Person of the Year, the messenger.

Standing for all that is good in the world, and hunted down by half the governments, he is a man we were waiting for, a man who stands up for the underdogs. Built on principles and ethics, an intriguing personality with a great philosophy behind his mottos, this man is courage personified.

A young Julian Assange was a part of a hacker group that had one of its mottos as share information. Perhaps a little inquisitiveness, personal experience and a strong sense of right and wrong has made this man we know today. Being one of the winners of Amnesty award and “one of the most influential person” he is still humble. A brain of unparalleled genius is transforming the now rotten field of journalism.

Greenday, the punk rock band asked the world, “Do you know your enemy?” and we didn’t till then. But today when the very basis of democracy is shattered by the bulk of secrets kept from the public we do realize who the enemy is. It is the regime, the very government that we elect and today Wikileaks has called for a change in this regime. The regime which wants to stay by covering their schemes, the wars they got into, the loss in those wars, is brought to open by these messengers. Julian Assange and his people revolted against the honor to obey, they brought down the silence which had been our enemy for so long. The new era for internet freedom has begun and this massive power of the internet is taming all those power-hungry politicos and bringing to the public all the dirty little secrets. 

This simple man, with very simple and straight philosophy, has showed to us the real face of the world’s most powerful democracy and the notorious secrets of other countries. A self-taught hacking expert and a computer-whiz, he is a revolution in the field of journalism, the press. The fourth pillar of democracy which sways public opinion in any direction, was till now a tool used by the governments to mould facts the way they want. We knew, the facts that we saw were not true, we knew there was also the “Other Side of the Story” but we stood silent. When incidents like 26/11 happened we thought we had enough of this silence. We rose up in violence and brought this government to senses that not always would we accept your facts. And this violence is the energy we seek now to bring reform. Wikileaks gave us channel to let this violence flow, a way to ask the government “what’s the truth?”

News supported with documents and material to prove the truth, is the new face of journalism. The sources are hidden but the documents echo the truth. The methods to acquire the documents are known yet “fool-proof”. And all this is the genius of one simple man. The power will now move in our hands when the foreman of control will be brought down, when his effigy will be burned.

But still one question lingers in the mind. Is it ethical?

Is it ok to steal the secrets of a government? And the answer lies in the fact, if we elect the people up there, we give them our trust votes then they should be entrust us about the annual spending, the wars and the losses suffered, the schemes carried out at international level. If not then the Heroes are waiting to spill the beans. It’s a choice upon the regime up there to decide. Either trust us with every step you take or acknowledge the fact that we do know who our enemy is.

- Aniket Sawant